|
|
|
To Return To This Menu,
Use Your Web Browser "Back"
Button |
|
|
|
The
Anti-Government Movement Guidebook
There is a movement afoot in this
country today that is made up of disaffected and often dispossessed Americans
who are seeking a better way through a wholesale return to their view of the
past. This movement has been called many things: the antigovernment
movement, the sovereignty movement, and the common law courts
movement. Regardless of the name attached to the beliefs and the people
who follow them, one common denominator exists: a feeling of despair,
rooted in personal and pecuniary loss, and manifested in a new, defiant
mistrust and spite for the ways of the current government. This guide
focuses on the ways in which followers of these movements impact the operation
of our state court systems.
This document is written in MS Word
and may be read by MS Word or a compatible word processor.
|
A lusty, gusty attack on "The Law"
as a curious, antiquated institution which, through outworn procedures,
technical jargon and queer mummery, enables a group of medicine-men to
dominate our social and political lives and our business, to their
own gain.
|
|
The BAR Card
What do you know of the BAR
Association? This short article exposé's the BAR for its criminal acts
and how it is destroying the rights of the People and their Constitutional
government.
|
Abatements respond to the majority
of imperial powers paperwork - head on.
When written and served properly, they have been very
successful at stopping imperial suits -
before they get started. Abatements have the force
and effect of an indictment and/or a civil case
or suit. When a defendant does not answer an abatement,
a Default, properly written and served, becomes Res Judicata,
i.e., final judgment has been made.
When properly served with default, they are a public record
of wrong doing, and as such, can be used by the abating
demandant (the one who serves the abatement)
in further actions against imperial powers fiduciaries (agents, bureaucrats,
judges, etc.), such as Trespass on Case.
|
|
Law
of Nations
National law is more a moral
than a legal science. Law is a rule of action prescribed by competent
authority. Moreover, all Law implies some sanction to enforce it. Now National
law is that which defines and regulates the social duties of Nation to Nation.
Where then is the authority that prescribes such duties, and where the
sanction that enforces them?
To find these we must go back to
the individual Man, and see whether such duties appertain to him; by what
authority, and with what sanctions.
|
Conversation With A
Marriage License Bureau
This is a very interesting transcript of an
interview with an employee of a State Marriage License Bureau.
This conversation exposes the Marriage License as a Contract
that cannot be broken with the State and grants the State absolute
authority over your family and your property.
|
|
Commercial Liens
The commercial lien, which is
authorized both by the common law and by Title 15 of the United States Code
(USC), is reportedly the same lien the IRS uses to take
Americans' homes and cars. However, some pro se litigants
do not depend upon Title 15, but upon the common law of
negotiable instruments (a.k.a. Commercial Law).
As such, it's almost impossible to
remove a commercial lien without the approval of the individual claimant
who filed the lien. Although a commercial lien can be
challenged by a court at common law or by a 7th Amendment
jury trial, it does not require a court process or a court
judgment for its establishment, validity, or execution. Therefore,
it appears that the courts may not be able to simply extinguish this lien on
their own discretion (or on motion from the lien debtors)
without the voluntary approval of the person who filed the lien.
Traditionally, these liens can
only be removed by the voluntary decision of the person who filed
the lien, by the decision of a constitutional jury trial at
common law, or by waiting 99 or 100 years. Since the
common law has been smothered in the U.S.A., all judges are
essentially powerless to overcome the liens.
|
|
Memorandum of Law
on the Name
Many people are involved in
diligent research concerning the use of all capital letters for
proper names, e.g., JOHN PAUL JONES as a substitute for
John Paul Jones in all court documents, driver's licenses,
bank accounts, birth certificates, etc..
Is the use of all capital letters to designate a name
some special English grammar rule or style?
Is it a contemporary American style of English?
Is the use of this form of capitalization recognized by
educational authorities? Is this
an official judicial or U.S. government rule and/or style
of grammar? Why do attorneys, court clerks, prosecutors judges,
insurance companies, banks, credit card companies,
utility companies, etc. always use all capital letters when
writing a proper name?
|
|
The
UCC Connection
This
is a slightly condensed, casually paraphrased transcript of tapes of a seminar
given in 1990 by Howard Freeman. It was prepared to make
available the knowledge and experience of Mr. Freeman in his search for
an accessible and understandable explanation of the confusing state of the
government and the courts. It should be helpful to those who
may have difficulty learning from such lectures, or those who want to develop
a deeper understanding of this information without having to listen
to three or four hours of recorded material.
|
Here is a Power Page
that is loaded with information. Mrs. Devvy Kidd has been
a guest on more than 1,000 radio shows and countless personal
speaking appearances. Devvy ran for Congress in 1994
& 1996. She has a 90-minute video titled, "What Congress
and the Media Won't Tell You." Mrs. Devvy Kidd
is also the author of four other published books dealing with
construction financing and government systems.
|
In the U.S., they're collectively
called everything from "attorney" to "lawyer"
to "counselor." Are these terms truly
equivalent, or has the identity of one been mistaken for another?
What exactly is a "Licensed BAR Attorney?"
This credential accompanies every legal paper produced
by attorneys - along with a State Bar
License number. As we are about to show you,
an "attorney" is not a "lawyer,"
yet the average American improperly interchanges these words as if they
represent the same occupation, and the average American attorney
unduly accepts the honor to be called "lawyer"
when he is not.
|
|
Trial
by Jury
LYSANDER
SPOONER tells us that for more than six hundred
years - that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 - there has been no clearer
principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal
cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the
facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but
that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of
the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their
opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or
resisting the execution of, such laws. This is
the full essay on Trial by Jury at common law that was
written by Lysander Spooner in the year of 1852.
|
|
The
Secret Of The Special Maritime Jurisdiction
A
brief dissertation exposing the true nature and cause of modern criminal
accusations by Valiant Liberty.
|
|
Legal
System v. Law System
Their
trade is deceit. There
is a difference between 'lawful' and 'legal'.
"Lawful"
contemplates the 'spirit of the law' and is embodied in the
moral and ethical consideration of rendering unto each man his due.
"Legal" is
the 'form of the law' and merely means that it is written
down someplace. It
is quite possible for something to be "legal" and still
be totally unlawful. This is a excellent study of the present
day courts of the United States.
|
|
Opinion of Judge Black, November 20, 1860
Judge Black submits a
Legal Opinion declaring that the use of the military upon any of
the States of the Union exceeds the Constitutional authority of the
President of the United States. For to bring the military of the
United States against a State is to expel that State from the Union.
|
|
The
Case of "Newdow v. Congress"
This
is the infamous case of Newdow v. Congress wherein the federal judges
of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled
that it was unconstitutional for children to recite the "Pledge of Allegiance"
in public schools.
|
|
The
Case of Stratemyer v. Hancock Insurance Company
Eugene
Stratemyer gives us a legal argument on the supremacy of land patents over any
enactment of corporate laws of any State.
|
|
Modern
Robber Barons
Robber baron is defined in Webster’s
as an American capitalist of the latter part of the 19th century
who became wealthy through exploitation (as of natural resources,
governmental influence, or low wage scales).
Today we have a new class of these robber barons which are
called "corporations."
A corporation is a
legal fiction; it doesn’t exist. Yes, it
exists materially, but it is enshrouded in a blanket of deceit called “corporate veil.”
The “United States” is a corporation for
remuneration (for profit), and so are all the States,
federal and otherwise, and all of their counties, parishes, cities,
towns, and other subdivisions. Under the
Clearfield Doctrine, derived from the 1943 Supreme Court
Decision in Clearfield Trust, et al. vs.
United States, (328 U.S. 363, 318), the court
ruled, in essence, that when a government reduces itself to a
corporate status, it becomes merely another corporation,
having no more nor less standing than all other corporations.
The good town in which we live, shop, and support, therefore,
belongs to we the people materially, but we are “governed”
by the new breed or robber baron as defined above.
|
We are living in a period of time
where nearly everyone in the world has been assigned a number.
Every Nation that has a national debt is required by their
multinational creditors to track taxpayers' income.
As you will soon find out, treaties with multinational authorities
require the United States and other governments to issue
Social Security numbers. This treatise is well
documented, not only from the perspective of the Holy Bible,
but by the laws and court cases of the
United States. Be sure to study the "Appendixes"
for the law as it applies to the United States.
|
An Attorney, representing employees
of an IRS Regional Office, writes a Treatise regarding the
taxing of wages, salaries, and first time commissions.
This attorney provides you with defenses, law origin
and authorities, how to handle a jury trial, how to
handle your own defense, discussion of law,
unacceptable defenses, tax evasion and willful failure to
file issues. This is a must read Treatise.
|
Both
concurrently exist today. The corporate system has been gaining predominance
in the last 70 years. Many Sovereigns have contracted with the
corporate system unknowingly, unintentionally, and or without full
disclosure. Which one do you want for yourself and your posterity?
Once you know the difference, you may have to make a decision for
yourself, your family, and your posterity. That decision may
require changes in how you do things. You may have to undo what has
been done and make your Sovereign status known. This is not taught
in government schools, because they do not want you to know this.
They want power and control over the masses they call "Human Resources."
|
George Mercier introduces us
to the "Invisible Contracts" that connect us to the
Internal Revenue Laws of the United States. This is
a very intense study of "Contract Law"
that everyone needs to study, especially if you decide that the
Internal Revenue Laws don't apply to you. To return
to this menu page, use your web browser "Back" button.
|
Many people have had their private
property classified as "Wetlands" by the
U.S. Department of Environmental Protection Agency.
Under such a classification, you cannot develop your property without
going through years of permit applications and concessions.
Enclosed is a "legal brief" challenging the
government's authority to regulate private property within the
State of Alaska as "Wetlands."
|
Can the state require you to obtain
a drivers' license or insurance to operate a vehicle on the public
right-of-ways? The answer may be found in two "Legal Briefs'
on your right to travel.
|
Do you own a gun? Did you
register it? Are the Gun Registration Laws in the
United States patterned after the Nazi Gun Laws of
the 1930's? Enclosed are two Articles on Nazi Gun
Control Laws as they are applied to the United States.
|
|
Taking Away Firearms
Have
you ever wondered why Congress wants to take away your firearms?
Go to your local
law library and
ask
the librarian to show you
where the books
for the United States Code
are shelved.
There are 25 books
in the set
and they are
reddish-brown in color.
Within
Volume Nine you will find the answer in P.L. 87-297.
|
The briefs and other
legal materials which you find here are those which cover subjects which
Attorney Larry Becraft believe are of interest to the
concerned American. In reference to the "federal jurisdiction"
materials, Mr. Becraft first read tons of cases dealing with
the issue and then compiled summaries of them; from that, Mr. Becraft
composed the brief utilizing only a small number of the
researched cases. The money issue is one of
his favorites, and he drafted the brief which appears here back in
the early 80's. The brief regarding Fifth Amendment
protection for personal financial records has its origins back in the
early 80's and over time, whenever he ran across a case which should
be included, he simply inserted the cite. The remaining
briefs cover several different topics.
|
Under the doctrine of
Parens Patriae, "Government As Parent,"
as a result of the manipulated bankruptcy of the United States
of America in 1930, all the assets of the American people,
their person, and of our country itself are held by the Depository Trust Corporation
at 55 Water Street, NY, NY, secured by
UCC Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as "debt money"
by the Federal Reserve. It may interest you to know that under
the umbrella of the Depository Trust Corporation lies the Federal Reserve Corporation
and the American Bar Association, the legal arm of
the banking interests.
|
Part
1. COURT PROCEDURE/ DUE
PROCESS The methodology used by the federal
courts and the Department of Justice to prevent any legal challenge to the
income tax from being brought before the court in income tax cases is
presented. The method, in violation of our most basic constitutional right,
has consistently been held to void any claim of jurisdiction in cases where
the plaintiff is other than the Internal Revenue Service.
Part 2.
LIBERTY---THE RIGHT TO MAKE A LIVING A
citizen's Right to Liberty secured by the Constitution has been repeatedly
adjudicated to include the right to pursue a livelihood, and such fundamental
constitutional rights are not suitable objects for taxation.
Part 3.
SPRINGER, POLLOCK, 16th AMENDMENT The
three items consistently claimed to adjudicate/authorize a tax on wages and
salaries are reviewed and it is concluded they have been misrepresented for
decades in what appears to be blatant fraud. The income tax imposed on an
individual's wages or salary is a bald faced sham without any claim to
acceptable legal adjudication.
Part 4.
MOTION TO DISMISS §7203 INDICTMENT A
generic motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action in a willful
failure to file case is based on the legal issues in Part 1.
Reference books are identified for edification.
Part 5.
HABEAS CORPUS/ CORUM NOBIS The motion in Part 4
is reworked and expanded into an academic post conviction relief for a willful
failure to file conviction. Reference material and procedural guidelines are
offered.
Part 6. CORAM
NOBIS Is there any way to challenge a
conviction on a willful failure to file charge after completion of sentence to
remove probation requirements/restrictions, eliminate payment of court
imposed fines, restore voting rights and gun ownership, remove a
public stigma, improve employment and credit potential, etc.? Using
the legal issues of Part 1
and the analysis of Parts 4
and 5, the
answer appears to be ‘Yes’ and without any filing fee
involved.
|
|
Tax
Cases
Herein is an index of several
tax cases that were ruled upon in federal courts.
These tax cases are listed so that you may be better informed when
preparing your own case.
|
|
|
Use form to search through the
files at this web site.
|
|
|
 Comments |
| Revised: February 26, 2008 |
